After not attending a Long Island Linux User Group meeting in months, my friends encouraged me attend to this one. I have taken some notes of the event and posted them for the benefit of my readers. Hopefully you can make sense of my somewhat arcane notes.
Why do I support the free culture movement?
Simply put, when software is free, it encourages people to tinker and learn things they may have not done otherwise due to economic factors. As software is made freely available, it will be easier for individuals to learn and likewise contribute to our workforce.
On Music, I believe that if given the opportunity people will choose to support artists. Significant inroads have been made with the iTunes music store and offering music at 99 cents a song and more recently, giving users the option of downloading DRM-free music. Bands such as Nine Inch Nails and Radiohead have released their albums freely and given users the opportunity to pay what they feel is reasonable.
The movie industry has recently reported record profits, despite claims people are pirating left and right. I prefer the experience of watching a movie at home or a friend’s house instead of a theater. Call me old, but my last experience involved a bunch of kids making the most annoying noises you can imagine and nonstop talking. More movies should be released either streaming over the web at a low cost or for free with some advertisements thrown in. The typical $10 at the door system really doesn’t work for me and I’m sure a lot of other people feel the same way.
So back to notes on the meeting… 
Free culture is actually two different things… The group, ‘Students for free culture’ and ‘free culture’
Presenter: G Parker Higgins
Free culture @ NYU
Free culture and free software : a new environmentalism
Students for free culture
• International organization, founded in 04
• Chapter-based, has over 30 chapters in high schools and colleges across the world
The group has four primary functions
• creating resources for chapters and public
• reaching out to student sand youth
• networking with groups
• issuing advocacy on behalf of chapters
• Free Culture @ New York University – An official club with a budget, primarily holding events on campus. Most of the events are open to the public.
• What kind of events– Held the first major DRM protest at the Apple Store over FairPlay and at Tower over Sony rootkits
• Held creative commons art show on campus and in second life
• Led national boycott of Regal cinemas what made it to Digg.com
• Host lectures that are available freely online
Definition of free cultural works
• Freedom to use and perform the work
• Freedom to study and apply information
• Freedom to redistribute copies
• Freedom to distribute derivative works
Objectives
• Promoting creativity in access and ability
• Fostering technological freedom
• Anti-DRM, support free software, oppose filtering, support net neutrality
• Founded by a group of student at Swarthmore college
• In 03 students posted 15k leaked internal Diebold e-mails and posted them to a school hosted server
• Diebold posted a DMCA takedown notice and sued the students
• Eventually the memos were allowed to be posted and the student
Lawrence Lessig - Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity
Richard Stallman - Free software, free society
Free software as an umbrella term
• Unite disparate groups with some common goals
• Common goals aren’t even necessarily known, but are achievable by a a large group much more than a single organization
Organizations in the free software movement
Long Island Linux User Group
EFF – Electronic Frontier Foundation
Creative Commons
Free Software Foundation
Public Knowledge
Downhill Battle
People having control over the free sharing of information is not a new phenomenon.
For centuries, the cost of reproduction has fallen, this is one dramatic stretch of it.
Today, distribution and collaborative development costs can be really low.
The fight will be easy
• Information wants to be free
• When people experience it, they want info to continue to be free
• Tech will continue to reduce the cost of reproduction
But not that easy…
• Industries that have business models in place don’t want anything to disrupt them, good or bad
• Record industry, movie industry, all rejected technologies that ultimately proved to be very beneficial to them
Why is it important?
• Any threat to fair use is a threat to free speech, not the least because of the chilling effects.
• Our media is highly dependent on fair use and open access.
People are always welcome at FC@NYU events. Subscribe to the listserv at www.freeculturenyu.com
- FreeCulture.org maintains an IRC channel at #freeculture on server irc.freenode.net
Questions / Comments
Attribution vs Derived works – A commonly discussed topic on the creative commons community listserv. The distinction is the same that applies to copyrights. If a copy is a derivative, you still have to attribute the original. There is a risk that something will be attributed to the maker.
What is the likelihood that 20 or 30 years down the future of the RIAA or other record labels taking into account the open source movement into their business models?
Every new medium has began by pirates. In many situations, companies held back technology out of fear. The same thing is happening to today with phone companies, high definition television on the Internet vs television, etc.
700MHz frequency. What will the outcome be? What is the FCC’s role in this.